User Tools

Site Tools


atmos:citation:research:soda_proecessing_1d_and_2d_hail_2d_hvps1

This is an old revision of the document!


Notes for self

  • np.ceil or np.round
    • for cases where 1 count, but soda does correction of * 1.1 / 5
      • so the 1 count would be 1 *1.1 /5 = ~.2 does the .2 count as a count since the /5 is a result of the 5 seconds?
  • hail counts from disp count forward. so 241841 is 41 42 43 44 45
  • cant say i understand it but in aarons code, the counts are multiplied by the 1.1 correction factor. then the conc is /5 which is the active time.
    • what doesn't make sense is that the counts are ~5x higher than the disp file, which is wrong because when the concentration is calculated, it takes into account that 5x factor and becomes decently close to the disp calculated conc
    • what also doesnt make sense is that the concentration from calculating it myself, using that /5 and *1.1 is that the concentration i calculate is consistently ~1.1 times higher than the concentration aaron gets.
      • could i be looking at the wrong code
  • ok update to previous bullet point. just not multiplying by 1.1 seems to be the move???
    • i think im missing where in aarons code he actually makes the concentration file because something is off here
      • and im still confused about why the counts should be /5 but thats not the step that I see taken in the code
atmos/citation/research/soda_proecessing_1d_and_2d_hail_2d_hvps1.1716086960.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/05/19 02:49 by klinman