atmos:citation:research:soda_proecessing_1d_and_2d_hail_2d_hvps1
This is an old revision of the document!
Notes for self
- np.ceil or np.round
- for cases where 1 count, but soda does correction of * 1.1 / 5
- so the 1 count would be 1 *1.1 /5 = ~.2 does the .2 count as a count since the /5 is a result of the 5 seconds?
- hail counts from disp count forward. so 241841 is 41 42 43 44 45
- cant say i understand it but in aarons code, the counts are multiplied by the 1.1 correction factor. then the conc is /5 which is the active time.
- what doesn't make sense is that the counts are ~5x higher than the disp file, which is wrong because when the concentration is calculated, it takes into account that 5x factor and becomes decently close to the disp calculated conc
- what also doesnt make sense is that the concentration from calculating it myself, using that /5 and *1.1 is that the concentration i calculate is consistently ~1.1 times higher than the concentration aaron gets.
- could i be looking at the wrong code
atmos/citation/research/soda_proecessing_1d_and_2d_hail_2d_hvps1.1716086255.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/05/19 02:37 by klinman